Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
[
Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05297162 (Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of PSMA PET/CT vs. mpMRI in Patients With a High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer and Previously Negative Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of PSMA PET/CT vs. mpMRI in Patients With a High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer and Previously Negative Biopsy: a Head to Head, Parallel, Prospective Trial (PROSPET-BX)."
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost Analysis of PSMA-PET in the PROSPET-BX Trial.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis prospective imaging trial was designed to compare [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in parallel in men with suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) after at least one previous negative biopsy (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05297162; GR-2018-12366240). MATERIALS AND
methodsBetween April 2022 and June 2025, we enrolled 130 patients who met the inclusion criteria and completed protocol investigations. Target lesions were defined based on PI-RADS v2.1 for mpMRI and PRIMARY Score, SUVmax and SUVratio for [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT. Findings were statistically correlated with pathology results. Subsequently, we developed a nomogram to predict clinically significant PCa (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade ≥ 2, using Boruta’s algorithm for variable selection.
resultsMedian age in our cohort was 65.5 years (range, 50.5–82.2) and median PSA 9.7 ng/ml (range, 4–35). According to pathology, 20 patients (15.4%) had csPCa, while most had negative biopsies (95;73%). Median SUVmax and SUVratio were 3.9 (range, 1.9–49.9) and 1.5 (range, 1-17.3), respectively, with optimal cut-offs of SUVmax > 6 and SUVratio ≥ 2.8. Diagnostic accuracy for csPCa was significantly higher for PRIMARY score than for PI-RADS (92% vs. 83%; p = 0.0344). Clinical and imaging variables were significantly correlated with csPCa (p < 0.01), with PSA density, PRIMARY score, SUVratio, and PI-RADS emerging as independent predictors. Based on these findings, we developed the PRIMER (PSA density, Radiological Index, Metabolic Evaluation, Re-biopsy setting) nomogram to assess csPCa likelihood, achieving an AUC of 0.8957 in the training set.
conclusions[68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT outperformers mpMRI in the re-biopsy setting. The developed PRIMER nomogram can predict csPCa likelihood before biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784782What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.