ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Interprofessional collaboration in internal medicine : Developments between health professions in German language publications].
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare is becoming increasingly more complex due to demographic change, chronic diseases, pandemics and heterogeneous living situations. Individual professional groups can hardly cope with these demands on their own. Internationally proven concepts of interprofessional collaboration in care, teaching and research show positive effects on processes, efficiency and outcomes.
objectiveThis article provides an overview of publications on interprofessional concepts, structures and research approaches in internal medicine as a basis for further discussion and needs analysis. MATERIAL/
methodsMixed-methods approach: two-stage modified Delphi method for term definition; bibliometric analysis of the journal Innere Medizin (Internal Medicine); qualitative exploration of publications from the last 5 years. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Over the last 5 years contributions on interprofessional care structures for complex cases have dominated, particularly for vulnerable and multimorbid patients (especially geriatrics, palliative medicine, oncology). Other topics include interprofessional exchange, nonpharmacological adjunctive treatment, digital and telemedicine applications; teaching and "team science" play a secondary role. OUTLOOK: Achieving interprofessionally anchored standard care requires a genuine paradigm shift . This requires expansion to other subareas also in the German internal medicine literature, a greater emphasis on teaching and "team science", systematically taking legal and financial framework conditions into account and systematically addressing the issue at the national level in order to close gaps in evidence and derive viable implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.