Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784767›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.

Bruce J W Evans, Rakhee Shah, Natalia Vlasak

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Risk factors and predictors for botulinum toxin type A reinjection within six months in patients with acute acquired concomitant esotropia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bruce J W EvansOptometry and Visual Sciences at City St George's, University of London, London, UK. bruce.evans.1@city.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2824-4595
Rakhee ShahOptometry and Visual Sciences at City St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-0936
Natalia VlasakHOYA Vision Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-4600-6117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review literature on anisometropia, concentrating on diagnostic criteria, contemporary prevalence and progression with regard to the changing distribution of refractive errors in many countries. Also, to consider anisometropia with respect to myopia and hyperopia control, regions/race/ethnicity, effects on visual function and associated conditions.

methodsScoping review based on searches of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases.

resultsVarious diagnostic criteria have been used for anisometropia, most commonly a SER difference ≥1.00 D. Anisometropia is more common in people with higher refractive errors, and therefore, its prevalence changes with the frequency distribution of refractive errors. Anisometropia is traditionally mostly associated with hyperopia, and this is still the case in some populations. In East and South-East Asia, the rapid increase in myopia has resulted in increased anisometropia. This is associated with impaired stereopsis and binocularity, as well as increased rates of strabismus and amblyopia. When anisometropia is corrected with spectacles, there is an increased risk of spectacle non-tolerance arising from aniseikonia (different image sizes in each eye) and prismatic effects. Contact lenses alleviate most of the problems associated with anisometropia, but are under-prescribed for this condition. The increased association between anisometropia and myopia has led to trials of myopia control interventions, which show promise for reducing anisometropia in myopic cases. However, since myopia in one eye is often a precursor of bilateral myopia, the likelihood of pre-myopia in the non-myopic eye should be considered.

conclusionsThe association between anisometropia and the magnitude of refractive error means that in populations with a high prevalence of myopia, anisometropia has largely become a feature of that refractive error, in contrast to the traditional association with hyperopia. This has important implications for myopia control. Vision screening and/or routine professional eye care are recommended because anisometropia is under-diagnosed.

Indexed as

AnisometropiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityDisease ProgressionHumansPrevalenceAmblyopiaAniseikoniaAnisometropiaMyopia controlRefractive errorStereopsis

Identifiers

PMID41784767
PMCPMC13368953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.