Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784761›Full record

SynthesisPhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2026

Light pollution and its possible influence on the wild fauna in parks in Oslo, Norway.

Tobias Bergan, Birthe Haddal, Helene Øygard Ryjord, Hanne Svea-Tornes, Terje Christensen

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tobias Bergan *Institute of Optometry, Radiography and Light Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Birthe Haddal *Institute of Optometry, Radiography and Light Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Helene Øygard Ryjord *Institute of Optometry, Radiography and Light Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway. heleneryjord@gmail.com.
Hanne Svea-Tornes *Institute of Optometry, Radiography and Light Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
Terje ChristensenInstitute of Optometry, Radiography and Light Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light pollution is often regarded as a problem mainly affecting previously undisturbed areas far from human activity, but its influence on seminatural ecosystems near urban areas has received far less attention. This study explores the effects of artificial lighting on wildlife in parks, aiming to provide knowledge applicable to practical lighting design. As lighting technology develops, increasingly optimal solutions are made possible for fulfilling the needs of the inhabitants in the city and preserving ecosystems. Access to nature and recreational areas is regarded as important for wellbeing and health even when it is dark. The topic is investigated through a systematic literature review of the effects of artificial light on animals that are expected to be present in parks. Behavioural as well as physiological effects of artificial lighting, preferentially at short wavelengths, have been documented in the literature study. The doses required to initiate the effects varied between species although little information is available about several species and animal groups. Three observational studies of lighting were conducted in park areas in Oslo to map typical lighting principles. An analysis of the results indicates that park lighting can impact wildlife in several ways. Phototaxis, positive and negative, is of particular interest because many species migrate between the parks and areas outside the parks, cross the parks or move inside the park areas. In a Nordic context, adapting to light and darkness throughout the seasons is important, and disturbance of natural life cycles may adversely influence various organisms. Natural ecosystems near urban areas has received far less attention. Several measures can be taken to better consider wildlife: avoiding short wavelengths, providing adequate shielding for light sources near water, and maintaining low light levels. Collaboration with biologists is recommended to develop optimal lighting solutions for wildlife in park areas. Many effects are yet to be documented, and recommendations may therefore change as further research emerges.

Indexed as

Animals, WildLightLight PollutionParks, RecreationalAnimalsHumansLightingNorway

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.