ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Research progress and clinical translation challenges in the use of oncolytic bacteria for cancer therapy.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial-based cancer therapy: mechanisms and therapeutic advances.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Oncolytic bacteria therapy for malignant glioma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oncolytic bacteria represent a distinct group of microorganisms capable of selectively infecting and colonizing tumor tissues while sparing normal cells. They exert anti-tumor effects primarily by activating the host immune system and eliciting a robust anti-tumor immune response, which ultimately mediates tumor cell killing. According to their distinct mechanisms of action and target specificities, oncolytic bacteria are currently categorized into three main types: direct oncolytic bacteria, indirect oncolytic bacteria, and prophylactic oncolytic bacteria. However, the clinical translation of these therapies faces several challenges, including suboptimal immunogenicity and uneven spatiotemporal distribution in vivo, which hinder their broader application. This review systematically examines the primary bacterial species utilized in cancer therapy and addresses the key obstacles impeding their clinical translation. Our aim is to lay a theoretical foundation and offer a technical perspective for developing safer and more efficacious oncolytic bacterial strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.