ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Reconstruction of normal morphology for simulated femoral condyle lesions based on shape statistical constraints and differential coordinate transformation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Knee lesions frequently result in morphological alterations or degenerative defects on the joint surface. This study aims to develop a reconstruction model that restores the pathological femoral condyle surface into a healthy morphology. A statistical shape model (SSM) was constructed using a healthy femoral condyle surface database as the base template for surface restoration. The restoration was achieved through differential coordinates (DC) transformation, constrained by statistical model parameters, template data, and the healthy portion of the pathological femoral condyle surface. Both the proposed method and the conventional SSM method were used for lesion restoration. The performance of both methods was compared using static geometric errors and dynamic joint motion errors, assessing surface accuracy and joint motion impact. For the proposed model, reconstruction errors remained low across both localized and extensive regions. Compared with the conventional SSM approach, the proposed method achieved better accuracy in both static geometric reconstruction and dynamic joint motion. It provides critical osteotomy positioning parameters and design references for patient-specific implants, and enhances the accuracy and efficiency of joint replacement surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41784751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.