Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784713›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2026

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of cyclosporine-A eye drops in herpetic stromal keratitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Nancy M Lotfy, Hamad Alshatti, Rola Y Khachaba, Sherein M Hagras

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05720715 (Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Cyclosporine A 0.05% Eye Drops in Management of Non- Necrotizing Herpetic Stromal Keratitis; a Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05720715 phase4completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Cyclosporine A 0.05% Eye Drops in Management of Non- Necrotizing Herpetic Stromal Keratitis; a Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFarwaniya HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsOutcomes of Cyclosporine Eye Drops in Herpetic KeratitisArmscyclosporine A 0.05% eye drops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nancy M LotfyOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hamad AlshattiOphthalmology Department, Farwanyia Hospital, Sabah Al Nasser, Kuwait. hamad.97.alshatti@gmail.com.
Rola Y KhachabaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sherein M HagrasOphthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the additive effect of topical cyclosporine A (Cs-A) 0.05% eye drops with topical prednisolone compared with that of topical prednisolone acetate 1% eye drops alone for the treatment of herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK).

methodsPatients diagnosed with HSK were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group A received Cs-A eye drops b.i.d. with prednisolone eye drops q.i.d.; Group B received topical prednisolone q.i.d. with placebo eye drops b.i.d.; both Groups A & B received a systemic acyclovir therapeutic dose of 400 mg five times daily, tapered to twice daily on the 10th day. Follow-up was performed weekly for 2 months. The primary outcome measures included duration of treatment, corneal edema (CE), haziness (CH), punctate epitheliopathy (CP) and vascularization (CV). The secondary outcome measures included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intraocular pressure (IOP).

resultsThirty eyes from 30 patients were included (15 in each group). At baseline, only the CP score was significantly greater in Group B. The duration of treatment was significantly shorter in Group A. At the 2-month follow-up, there were significant improvements in the CE, CH and CP scores in both groups compared with the baseline scores, but there were no significant differences between the groups. There was a significant improvement in BCVA in both groups compared with baseline scores, but there was no significant difference between the groups. Two patients in group B required topical drops to control the IOP.

conclusionThe addition of Cs-A eye drops to the treatment protocol for HSK patients has a significant role in shortening the duration of treatment in the management of HSK patients with and without epithelial ulceration. REGISTRATION: The study protocol was approved by the Local Review Board (Registration code: 2261), and ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05720715).

Indexed as

CyclosporineHerpetic stromal keratitisPrednisolone

Identifiers

PMID41784713
PMCPMC13076742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.