ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Unwrapping the mirror tracing task.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Mirror Tracing Task (MTT) is a method used to study visuomotor skills learning. It is traditionally evaluated by counting the number of times a person draws outside of the borders of a figure, typically a star, while looking at its mirror reflection. While insightful for overall performance, this metric lacks a precise analysis of the tracing, such as details on errors in specific regions. We propose a new MTT analysis method that studies the drawing as a function of the angle around the figure's center. Two new variables are introduced: residuals, which measure deviation from the ideal drawing, and density, which measures how often a specific path is retraced. These variables are defined per angle or region, allowing a more detailed analysis, highlighting the most challenging parts of the drawing for each person, and enabling comparison across trials or finding common patterns between individuals. We applied this approach to the first MTT trial of 210 participants using age as a variable of interest. Residuals and density were summarized as a single value and compared with the traditional approach, providing similar results. When analyzed as a function of the angle, these variables enabled the identification of specific regions of the star where the errors are age-sensitive. Additionally, a time series-like approach enabled us to cluster drawings and quantify their similarity. The code used for this new method has been made openly accessible to make it easier for its applications in new research or the reanalysis of previous projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.