Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784699›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Unwrapping the mirror tracing task.

Pablo F Garrido, Anne Cecilie Sjøli Bråthen, Emilie Sogn Falch, Jonas Kransberg, Anders M Fjell, Øystein Sørensen, Kristine B Walhovd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pablo F GarridoCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway. p.f.garrido@fys.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6005-7178
Anne Cecilie Sjøli BråthenCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-0000
Emilie Sogn FalchCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0813-4394
Jonas KransbergCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9770-8360
Anders M FjellCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-8774
Øystein SørensenCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0724-3542
Kristine B WalhovdCenter for Lifespan Changes in Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, POB 1094 Blindern, 0317, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1918-1123

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 771355Norges Forskningsråd 301395Norges Forskningsråd 325001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mirror Tracing Task (MTT) is a method used to study visuomotor skills learning. It is traditionally evaluated by counting the number of times a person draws outside of the borders of a figure, typically a star, while looking at its mirror reflection. While insightful for overall performance, this metric lacks a precise analysis of the tracing, such as details on errors in specific regions. We propose a new MTT analysis method that studies the drawing as a function of the angle around the figure's center. Two new variables are introduced: residuals, which measure deviation from the ideal drawing, and density, which measures how often a specific path is retraced. These variables are defined per angle or region, allowing a more detailed analysis, highlighting the most challenging parts of the drawing for each person, and enabling comparison across trials or finding common patterns between individuals. We applied this approach to the first MTT trial of 210 participants using age as a variable of interest. Residuals and density were summarized as a single value and compared with the traditional approach, providing similar results. When analyzed as a function of the angle, these variables enabled the identification of specific regions of the star where the errors are age-sensitive. Additionally, a time series-like approach enabled us to cluster drawings and quantify their similarity. The code used for this new method has been made openly accessible to make it easier for its applications in new research or the reanalysis of previous projects.

Indexed as

LearningPsychomotor PerformanceFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAgingData clusteringMirror tracing taskPolar coordinatesTime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID41784699
PMCPMC12963139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.