SynthesisApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026
What about the bright side? A systematic review of psychosocial antecedents of well-being among forensic healthcare workers.
Synthesis in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What about the bright side? A systematic review of psychosocial antecedents of well-being among forensic healthcare workers.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Pooled it
- The Effect of Perceived Supportive Resources on Counterproductive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Thriving at Work Among Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic healthcare workers (FHWs) are highly susceptible to work-related stress and declining well-being due to frequent interactions with forensic patients, who often exhibit violent behavior. While much of the existing literature has centered on the factors that predict ill-being among FHWs, such as stress and burnout levels, fewer studies have explored the elements that actively contribute to their well-being. However, focusing solely on problems and their solutions overlooks the factors that promote well-being and does not ensure employees' potential to truly flourish. Hence, this systematic review adopted a positive psychological perspective by investigating the psychosocial antecedents of positive indicators of FHWs' well-being. The review analyzed studies from Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, following PRISMA guidelines, and included 54 papers. Six primary outcome variables were identified: job satisfaction, well-being and positive mental health, life satisfaction, resilience, adaptive coping, and other variables (confidence, self-efficacy, and posttraumatic growth). Organizational and interpersonal support were the most common antecedents for job satisfaction, well-being, and positive mental health, and partially for resilience. Job characteristics, such as autonomy and work involvement, were significant for life satisfaction and well-being. Organizational justice also consistently emerged as an antecedent of both job and life satisfaction. These findings suggest key pathways for supporting FHWs' well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.