ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
Conflicting adaptations in an inhibitory feedback circuit.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural networks maintain stable activity levels by compensating for perturbations through homeostatic plasticity. However, homeostatic mechanisms operating at different levels may conflict with each other. For example, in inhibitory feedback circuits, if inhibitory neurons receive excess excitation, compensation at a 'local' level (e.g. reducing inhibitory neurons' activity) could conflict with 'network-level' compensation (e.g. suppressing the excitatory neurons responsible for overexciting the inhibitory neurons). We studied this problem in the Drosophila mushroom body, where excitatory Kenyon cells (KCs) receive feedback inhibition from the anterior paired lateral (APL) neuron. Dual-colour calcium imaging revealed that prolonged (24 h) artificial activation of KCs causes APL to become less sensitive to KC activity. Meanwhile, KCs compensate for their excess activity by reducing excitation, yet this change is opposed by reduced inhibition from APL. This conflict meant that KCs did not consistently show the expected homeostatic reduction in odour responses. Our findings show that neurons sometimes adapt their activity locally in a way that counteracts broader adaptations in the network. KEY POINTS: Neural networks maintain stable activity levels through homeostatic plasticity - but what physiological variables are stabilised? In inhibitory feedback circuits, local and network-level compensation might conflict. For example, if excitatory neurons are overactive, they might compensate by becoming less excitable. But if inhibitory neurons compensate for the excess excitation by also becoming less excitable, this would decrease inhibition onto the excitatory neurons and increase their activity. We tested this idea in the fruit fly brain, where excitatory Kenyon cells (KCs) get negative feedback from an inhibitory neuron called anterior paired lateral (APL). After overactivation of KCs, APL becomes less sensitive to KCs. The resulting loss of inhibition onto KCs counteracts KCs' attempts to reduce their activity. These results show that adaptation at local and network levels can conflict with each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.