ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
History bias and its perturbation of the stimulus representation in the macaque prefrontal cortex.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurons embedded in loop-like motifs act as central hubs for brain-wide integration.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Out of the single-neuron straitjacket: Neurons within assemblies change selectivity and their reconfiguration underlies dynamic coding.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple history biases affect our representation of magnitudes, such as time, distance and size. It is not clear whether the previous stimuli interfere with the discrimination process from the moment of stimulus presentation, during working memory retention or even later during the decision-making phase. We used a spatial discrimination task involving two stimuli of different magnitudes, presented sequentially at various distances from the centre. The monkey's task was to select the farthest of them. We showed that the previous stimulus magnitude produced an attractive effect on the current stimulus magnitude and that this effect was stronger when their stimulus features differed. In this case at the neural level we also observed that decoding of the stimulus magnitude achieved the highest accuracy when it matched the magnitude of the preceding stimulus for which the decoder was trained. This indicates that past stimuli can affect magnitude processing already during the stimulus presentation, even before the decision-making process. Interestingly this effect coincided with an 'activity-silent' period, followed by the reactivation of the decoding of the previous stimulus magnitude. KEY POINTS: Previous experience alters how we perceive the world, including the magnitudes of stimuli. We show that the magnitude of the previous stimulus exerts an attractive effect on the perceived magnitude of the current stimulus, and unexpectedly, this effect is enhanced when their visual features mismatch. It is still debated whether the history effect results from interference with stimulus processing, from its persistence in memory or during the decision-making phase. By recording from the monkey's prefrontal cortex, we found that decoding of the first stimulus is facilitated when its magnitude is similar to that of the recent past stimulus, indicating that the influence of the past stimulus begins during stimulus processing. The effect of the previous stimulus magnitude on the representation of the first current stimulus was stronger during the period in which the past stimulus was not explicitly decoded (the activity-silent phase) and preceded its reactivation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.