Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784475›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026

History bias and its perturbation of the stimulus representation in the macaque prefrontal cortex.

Danilo Benozzo, Lorenzo Ferrucci, Francesco Ceccarelli, Aldo Genovesio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danilo BenozzoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0480-8704
Lorenzo FerrucciDepartment of Wellbeing, Health and Environmental Sustainability, Sapienza University of Rome.ORCID 0000-0003-4967-2951
Francesco CeccarelliDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-8204
Aldo GenovesioDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2521-143X

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PRIN 2017: 2017KZNZLN_004National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) PE0000006Sapienza University RM123188F6C0E21E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple history biases affect our representation of magnitudes, such as time, distance and size. It is not clear whether the previous stimuli interfere with the discrimination process from the moment of stimulus presentation, during working memory retention or even later during the decision-making phase. We used a spatial discrimination task involving two stimuli of different magnitudes, presented sequentially at various distances from the centre. The monkey's task was to select the farthest of them. We showed that the previous stimulus magnitude produced an attractive effect on the current stimulus magnitude and that this effect was stronger when their stimulus features differed. In this case at the neural level we also observed that decoding of the stimulus magnitude achieved the highest accuracy when it matched the magnitude of the preceding stimulus for which the decoder was trained. This indicates that past stimuli can affect magnitude processing already during the stimulus presentation, even before the decision-making process. Interestingly this effect coincided with an 'activity-silent' period, followed by the reactivation of the decoding of the previous stimulus magnitude. KEY POINTS: Previous experience alters how we perceive the world, including the magnitudes of stimuli. We show that the magnitude of the previous stimulus exerts an attractive effect on the perceived magnitude of the current stimulus, and unexpectedly, this effect is enhanced when their visual features mismatch. It is still debated whether the history effect results from interference with stimulus processing, from its persistence in memory or during the decision-making phase. By recording from the monkey's prefrontal cortex, we found that decoding of the first stimulus is facilitated when its magnitude is similar to that of the recent past stimulus, indicating that the influence of the past stimulus begins during stimulus processing. The effect of the previous stimulus magnitude on the representation of the first current stimulus was stronger during the period in which the past stimulus was not explicitly decoded (the activity-silent phase) and preceded its reactivation.

Indexed as

Prefrontal CortexAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermNeuronsPhotic StimulationSpace Perceptioncontraction biasdistance discrimination taskhistory biasmonkeysprefrontal cortexsilent coding

Identifiers

PMID41784475
PMCPMC13039257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.