ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Considering the Effect of Neural Adaptation in the Estimation of Haidinger's Brush Perceptual Threshold.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Haidinger's brushes in albinism: altered perception patterns in single cases.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the role of neural adaptation in the perception of Haidinger's brushes, an entoptic phenomenon enabling the perception of polarization by the human visual system. The objective was to consider the rotational speed of the pattern in combination with the polarization level of the input light, to identify normal values in a cohort of healthy individuals. Methods: An experimental setup was designed and assembled using two LED sources, one of which was filtered by a rotating linear polarizer with adjustable speed. The relative intensity of the LEDs could be changed to tune the polarization level. A cohort of 37 healthy individuals underwent monocular testing at seven polarization levels. For each value, descending and ascending limit tests were conducted to determine the rotational speed thresholds. Results: The rotational speed threshold decreases linearly with the logarithm of the polarization level. All participants could perceive the pattern down to at least 20% polarization, with a dramatic drop in the number of subjects at 10% and 5% polarization levels. The estimated average polarization threshold was 9.7 ± 1.2%. Lower initial rotational thresholds at maximum contrast corresponded with lower polarization thresholds. Conclusions: The study confirms the crucial role of rotational speed in the perception of Haidinger's brushes, especially at low polarization levels. As a normal pattern perception correlates with macular pigment distribution and density, those findings are essential for the development and calibration of screening devices based on Haidinger's brush perception for the early detection of maculopathy and other macular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.