ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
How Does Transcription-Associated Mutagenesis Shape tRNA Microevolution?
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Allelic Variation at tRNA Genes in Three Nematode Species Indicates Mutation Load Despite Strong Purifying Selection.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are among the most highly conserved and frequently transcribed genes. Recent studies have demonstrated that tRNAs experience exceptionally high rates of transcription-associated mutagenesis (TAM) as well as strong purifying selection. How the mutational input of TAM, which induces a nonuniform distribution of nucleotide substitutions, affects the fitness of tRNA molecules is unclear. Secondary structure in tRNAs is strongly conserved over macroevolutionary time, suggesting that mutations that disrupt paired sites may be especially deleterious, and TAM-induced mutations primarily involve nucleotide transitions, which tend to preserve base-pairing stability. To examine how TAM affects tRNA molecule fitness and shapes tRNA evolution over short timescales, we analyzed tRNA allelic variation in contemporary Caenorhabditis elegans strains. We propose a model of tRNA microevolution driven by TAM and demonstrate that the observed secondary structure characteristics align with our predicted TAM-biased patterns. Furthermore, we developed a continuous Markov substitution model that incorporates TAM-specific mutational biases. This TAM-biased model fits the C. elegans tRNA data more effectively than standard models, such as the general time-reversible model. Based on these results, we conclude that tRNAs in natural populations carry substantial levels of structure-destabilizing mutations, which may be tolerated but nevertheless likely induce meaningful fitness costs. Our findings are consistent with recent experimental studies on tRNA fitness in yeast, but challenge prior theoretical and computational analyses that emphasize RNA base-pairing as a primary determinant in genotype-phenotype systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.