Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784218›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

High-fidelity neural speech reconstruction through an efficient acoustic-linguistic dual-pathway framework.

Jiawei Li, Chunxu Guo, Chao Zhang, Edward F Chang, Yuanning Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiawei LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Chunxu GuoSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Chao ZhangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Edward F ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-4700
Yuanning LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-0600

Funding

Lin Gang Laboratory LG-GG-202402-06Lin Gang Laboratory LGL-1987-18National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371154National Science and Technology Major Project 2025ZD0217000Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 24QA2705500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconstructing speech from neural recordings is crucial for understanding human speech coding and developing brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). However, existing methods trade off acoustic richness (pitch, prosody) for linguistic intelligibility (words, phonemes). To overcome this limitation, we propose a dual-path framework to concurrently decode acoustic and linguistic representations. The acoustic pathway uses a long-short term memory (LSTM) decoder and a high-fidelity generative adversarial network (HiFi-GAN) to reconstruct spectrotemporal features. The linguistic pathway employs a transformer adaptor and text-to-speech (TTS) generator for word tokens. These two pathways merge via voice cloning to combine both acoustic and linguistic validity. Using only 20 min of electrocorticography (ECoG) data per human subject, our approach achieves highly intelligible synthesized speech (mean opinion score = 4.0/5.0, word error rate = 18.9%). Our dual-path framework reconstructs natural and intelligible speech from ECoG, resolving the acoustic-linguistic trade-off.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesLinguisticsSpeechElectrocorticographyGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumansLong Short Term MemorySpeech Intelligibilityauditory cortexbrain-computer interfacesbrain-to-speechdeep neural networkselectrocorticographyhumanneurosciencespeech decoding

Identifiers

PMID41784218
PMCPMC12962650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.