Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41784009›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2026

Distributed fusion R-learner of heterogeneous treatment effect using distributed medicaid data.

Jinhong Li, Julie M Donohue, Lu Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinhong LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1246-4991
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
Lu TangDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6143-9314

Funding

Improving quality measurement for opioid use disorder treatment using a multi-state Medicaid research networkRM1DA059365 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Andrew James Barnes, Julie Marie Donohue · 2023 to 2026
$9.3M
Reducing variation in access to medications for opioid use disorder in MedicaidR01DA055585 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONOHUE, JULIE MARIE · 2022 to 2025
$5.3M
Examining the quality of opioid use disorder treatment in a Medicaid research networkR01DA048029 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DONOHUE, JULIE MARIE · 2019 to 2021
$3.5M
Improving Safety and Trustworthiness in Data-Driven Decision Learning for SepsisR56LM014522 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TANG, LU · 2025 to 2025
$829k
Federated learning methods for heterogeneous and distributed Medicaid dataR21DA055672 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TANG, LU · 2023 to 2024
$418k
National Science Foundation DMS 2310217NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA055672NIH HHS R01DA048029NIH HHS R01DA055585NIH HHS R21DA055672NIH HHS R56LM014522NIH HHS RM1DA059365NLM NIH HHS R56 LM014522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in data-driven decision-making has stimulated method developments in estimating heterogeneous treatment effect. In practice, accurately estimating a conditional average treatment effect (CATE) requires a large sample, which is often realized by data integration that leverages information from multiple data sites. This paper attempts to address two challenges involved in such task, treatment effect heterogeneity and privacy protection. The first pertains to differences in the CATE coefficient across sites due to heterogeneity in treatment effect; the second pertains to barriers in sharing sensitive data across sites. We propose a distributed fusion learning approach, DF $R$-learner, to jointly estimate CATE across sites without pooling individual-participant data. It allows the CATE functions to differ and uses a data-driven fusion penalty to combine similar parameters across sites in achieving improved estimation. The estimator uses confidence distributions to facilitate efficiency and private information exchange, which we show theoretically and empirically no loss of efficiency compared to its counterpart based on centralized data. We examine DF $R$-learner through a study of medication treatment for opioid use disorder using distributed Medicaid data from multiple managed care organizations within the state of Pennsylvania.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedicaidHumansModels, StatisticalTreatment Effect HeterogeneityUnited StatesConfidence distributionDistributed computingDouble machine learningFused lassoHeterogeneous treatment effect

Identifiers

PMID41784009
PMCPMC13016822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.