ArticleBiometrics2026
Distributed fusion R-learner of heterogeneous treatment effect using distributed medicaid data.
Article in Biometrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in data-driven decision-making has stimulated method developments in estimating heterogeneous treatment effect. In practice, accurately estimating a conditional average treatment effect (CATE) requires a large sample, which is often realized by data integration that leverages information from multiple data sites. This paper attempts to address two challenges involved in such task, treatment effect heterogeneity and privacy protection. The first pertains to differences in the CATE coefficient across sites due to heterogeneity in treatment effect; the second pertains to barriers in sharing sensitive data across sites. We propose a distributed fusion learning approach, DF $R$-learner, to jointly estimate CATE across sites without pooling individual-participant data. It allows the CATE functions to differ and uses a data-driven fusion penalty to combine similar parameters across sites in achieving improved estimation. The estimator uses confidence distributions to facilitate efficiency and private information exchange, which we show theoretically and empirically no loss of efficiency compared to its counterpart based on centralized data. We examine DF $R$-learner through a study of medication treatment for opioid use disorder using distributed Medicaid data from multiple managed care organizations within the state of Pennsylvania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.