Observational studyArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2026
Comparison of Cardiovascular Events in Patients Receiving Concomitant Clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors Classified by CYP2C19 Inhibitory Potency.
Observational study in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may potentially reduce clopidogrel's antiplatelet effect and increase cardiovascular risk. The degree of CYP (cytochrome P450) 2C19 inhibition varies among PPIs. Few studies have evaluated individual PPIs by CYP2C19 inhibition strength across countries. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiovascular events between strong CYP2C19-inhibiting potency and weak CYP2C19-inhibiting potency (weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs) in patients receiving clopidogrel.
methodsWe conducted an international observational cohort study using 14 databases from the United States, South Korea, and Taiwan. We included patients aged ≥18 years who received clopidogrel with PPIs from 1985 to 2023. PPIs were classified into strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs and weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs based on CYP2C19 inhibition. We compared the hazard ratios and 95% CIs for major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality, using the Cox proportional hazards model after 1:1 propensity score matching. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality. A random-effects model calculated pooled hazard ratios and 95% CIs. Only databases meeting all diagnostic criteria were included in the meta-analysis.
resultsLarge-scale propensity score matching identified 166 005 patient pairs. During the 365-day follow-up, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between patients receiving clopidogrel plus strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs and those receiving clopidogrel plus weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs (17.63 per 1000 person-years versus 16.82 per 1000 person-years; calibrated hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.79-1.26]). No significant difference was observed in the risk of secondary outcomes (calibrated hazard ratio, cardiovascular mortality 1.10 [95% CI, 0.87-1.39], myocardial infarction 0.98 [95% CI, 0.81-1.19], stroke 1.05 [95% CI, 0.87-1.27], and all-cause mortality 1.18 [95% CI, 0.93-1.50]).
conclusionsConcomitant use of clopidogrel and strong CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs was not associated with a higher cardiovascular risk compared with concomitant use of clopidogrel and weak or non-CYP2C19-inhibiting PPIs. This large-scale study does not support the clinical significance of potential interactions between PPIs and clopidogrel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.