ReviewCureus2026
Neural Networks of Unconscious Processes: A Systematic Review of Functional Connectivity in Dreams and Free Association.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although previous neurophysiological studies validated aspects of unconscious processing, a detailed characterization of specific neural circuits required modern functional neuroimaging techniques. This systematic review examines the shared neural substrates between dreaming and free association of ideas, two paradigmatic manifestations of unconscious processing. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (last 25 years) using terms related to functional neuroimaging, REM (rapid eye movement) sleep/NREM (non‑rapid eye movement) sleep, and free association. A total of 28 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria were included: use of advanced neuroimaging techniques (functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG), intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), and positron emission tomography (PET)), research in humans on unconscious processes, and explicit linkage to functional neuroanatomy. Bias assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Both processes converge in the activation of the default mode network (DMN), specifically the medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus. During REM sleep, hyperactivation of the amygdalo-hippocampal complex is observed with functional disconnection of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Free association shows similar patterns: activation of the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus with reduced prefrontal modulation. Functional microstates in REM reveal oscillations between tonic (residual sensory processing) and phasic (environmental isolation) periods. Thalamo-cortical connectivity modulates narrative content generation in both states. The findings empirically validate psychoanalytic concepts through the identification of shared neural circuits. Prefrontal deactivation facilitates the expression of associations embedded in deep semantic networks, released from executive control. These results establish neurobiological foundations for contemporary neuropsychoanalysis and suggest specific therapeutic targets for interventions in unconscious processing disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.