ReviewCureus2026
Flight Stressors: Pathophysiological Principles Guiding Safe Fixed-Wing Aeromedical Transport of Critically Ill Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human limits in next-generation fighter aviation: psychophysiological stressors, readiness, health, performance, and countermeasures.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
International travel increases the chance of patients requiring aeromedical evacuation due to unexpected medical emergencies or worsening chronic medical conditions. Although critically ill patients are exclusively managed by specialized teams, all medics manage patients who may require air transfer after stabilization and first-tier management. These patients may face unpredictable and potentially harmful conditions at high altitudes. The aim of this study is to highlight in-flight factors that may negatively affect patients' well-being en route, providing useful information for all medics. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar, up to March 2025, employing a multimethod approach to identify all relevant studies for this review. The search continued until no new citations emerged. Basic principles of physics are applied to clinical situations, demonstrating the relationship among pressure, volume, and temperature, which might affect pathophysiological processes of the human body under certain circumstances. Unique flight stressors, including the hypobaric aeronautical environment, thermal stress, gravitational forces, vibration, and noise, may adversely affect patients' health. In-flight hypoxia is the most important risk during air transfer. Other hazardous conditions include the tendency for increased risk of thromboembolic events, as well as the potential for gas embolism, gas expansion in normally pneumatized body cavities, and malfunction of pneumatically operated medical devices. Even small amounts of trapped gas can lead to serious complications. This narrative review provides valuable information regarding in-flight stressors and experiences that physicians must be aware of and predict for safe aeromedical evacuation of critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.