ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
A new, rapid, chemiluminescence enzyme assay for the detection of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a comparison between functional and immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia assays.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explosive Multiterritorial Arterial Thrombosis Following Brief Heparin Exposure: A Diagnostic Pitfall in the Cath Lab.Case reports in cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially fatal complication of therapy with unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins that can result in thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Timely clinical and laboratory diagnoses are imperative to prevent further morbidity and mortality. Objectives: To evaluate a rapid high-sensitivity chemiluminescence luminescence enzyme immunoassay (HISCL HIT IgG assay) compared with automated and ELISA antigen assays and heparin-induced platelet activation (HIPA) functional assays on samples healthy donors, patients suspected of having HIT, and other patient subgroups. Methods: The HISCL HIT IgG, HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG, HemosIL HIT-Ab Results: Of the 67 HIPA-positive samples, 67 were positive by the HISCL HIT IgG assay. Of the 142 HIPA-negative samples, 104 were negative with the HISCL HIT IgG assay (specificity 73.2%), compared with 97 of 142 negative results with the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG assay (specificity 68.3%). The other assays exhibited lower specificity. The HISCL HIT IgG Assay Kit had no false positive results in samples with potentially interfering substances. Conclusions: The HISCL HIT IgG assay had 100% sensitivity and superior specificity compared with other antigen assays. Good correlation was observed between plasma and serum samples, and the time to result was ∼25% faster than the HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.