ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2026
Wear of 3D-printed resin denture teeth under self-antagonist conditions after chewing simulation.
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare the wear depth and volume loss of 3D-printed resin denture teeth with prefabricated and milled acrylic denture teeth under chewing simulation. MATERIALS AND
methodsFour groups of denture teeth (n = 9) were evaluated: prefabricated acrylic teeth (PT), milled acrylic teeth (MT), 3D-printed methacrylate-based resin teeth (3DT), and glazed 3D-printed resin teeth (3DT+G). Samples were embedded in self-curing resin, and antagonists were fabricated from the same materials. A chewing simulator was utilized to apply a cyclic occlusal load of 49.05 N (5 kg) for 120,000 cycles in distilled water. Wear depth (µm) and volume loss (mm
resultsSignificant differences in wear depth and volume loss were observed among the groups (
conclusion3D-printed resin denture teeth demonstrated superior wear resistance compared to prefabricated and milled alternatives under simulated chewing conditions. Furthermore, the application of a 50 µm surface glaze did not significantly enhance wear resistance of the 3D-printed resin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.