ArticleJournal of public health research2026
Descriptive analysis of anaphylactic events reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
Article in Journal of public health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening reaction with a growing global prevalence. Drugs are a leading trigger in adults, but real-world data on the severity and specific agents involved are limited. This study aimed to utilize the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database to systematically identify cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis, quantify the distribution of outcomes, and identify the medications most frequently associated with these severe reactions. Design and methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using FAERS data from its inception to September 2025. Cases were identified by searching for anaphylaxis-related preferred terms. Data on patient demographics, reporter type, outcomes, and suspect drugs were extracted and analyzed descriptively. Results: Among 98,081 cases analyzed, the vast majority (91.10%) were serious but non-fatal, with a 5.53% fatality rate. Reports were most common in adults aged 18-64 (49.79%) and females (55.44%). A dramatic increase in annual reports was observed from 1969 to 2025. Antibiotics (25.00%), analgesics (20.00%), and radiocontrast media (15.00%) were the most frequently reported drug categories. The top individual drugs associated with anaphylaxis included omalizumab, propofol, and infliximab. Conclusion: This analysis underscores the significant and growing public health burden of drug-induced anaphylaxis. The findings emphasize the need for continued clinician vigilance and enhanced pharmacovigilance to improve patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.