ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Game over: dissecting the overlooked health harms of modern sports.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An initial typology of the commercial determinants of physical activity.Health promotion international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article interrogates the "sport-health ideology" that equates organized sport with population wellbeing, arguing that it conflates the proven benefits of routine physical activity with the distinct injury profiles, labor relations, and political functions of modern sport. Synthesizing scholarship from sociology, public health, and bioethics, we show how elite and commercialized sport institutionalizes a culture of risk linked to musculoskeletal trauma, neurodegeneration, and normalized pain; embeds corporate sponsorships that promote unhealthy consumption; and operates through biopolitical regimes that intensify bodily manipulation for performance while denying comparable care to non-athlete publics. We trace the sport economy's dependence on precarious and exploitative labor, from collegiate exploitation to mega-event construction, and examine how patriotic pageantry and media partnerships constitute a "sport-security nexus" that aestheticizes U.S. militarism and its downstream health harms, including in Iraq and Gaza. We argue that sport bioethics must move beyond doping and concussion to treat labor rights, occupational and environmental standards, sponsorship governance, and demilitarization as first-order determinants of health. Redirecting investment toward low-risk, community-based movement, enforcing transparent safety surveillance across athletes and event workers, and severing ties with harmful industries are necessary to align sport with health justice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.