Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783767›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in reproductive health2026

Task-shifting through community health workers: factors influencing access and utilization of modern family planning methods in Ziniaré, Burkina Faso.

Fatimata Koinda, Tabither Gitau, Wilfred Zoungrana, Erick Yegon, Nzomo Mwita, Assetou Zongo, Lamissi Sawadogo, Alice Koimur, Claire Nyabonyi, Rhonnie Omondi Omollo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fatimata KoindaPrograms Department, Living Goods, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Tabither GitauPrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Wilfred ZoungranaPrograms Department, Living Goods, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Erick YegonPrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nzomo MwitaPrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Assetou ZongoPrograms Department, Living Goods, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Lamissi SawadogoPrograms Department, Living Goods, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Alice KoimurPrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Claire NyabonyiPrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rhonnie Omondi OmolloPrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joseph Kyalo NjorogePrograms Department, Living Goods, Nairobi, Kenya.
Andre Ky YollandPrograms Department, Living Goods, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Mahamadi TassembedoDirectorate of Community Health, Ministry of Health, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Burkina Faso has expanded access to family planning (FP) with modern contraceptive use prevalence among married women reaching 32% in 2021. However, regional disparities persist, especially in rural Ziniaré district where unmet needs among married women remain high (20%). Barriers like stigma, limited youth-friendly services, and low contraceptive awareness hinder uptake. This study examined factors influencing modern FP use and explored the role of community health workers, Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional comparative mixed-methods implementation study with quasi-experimental features, following TREND reporting guidelines, in Ziniaré district, in August 2024. The study included four intervention and three control communes. Intervention communes received an eight-month package for ASBCs that included FP training, provision of short-acting contraceptives (oral pills, subcutaneous DMPA, condoms), regular supportive supervision and structured performance monitoring. Control communes continued to provide routine, primarily facility-based FP services. Quantitative data were collected from 282 women aged 15-49 years (136 intervention, 146 control) using structured household questionnaires; analyses included descriptive statistics and multilevel logistic regression ( Results: Modern contraceptive prevalence was 48% in the intervention group and 53% in the control group, without statistical significance (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.27-1.68, Conclusion: Despite ASBC-led task-shifting improving awareness, engagement, and access to FP services, the difference in contraceptive prevalence between intervention and control communes (48% vs. 53%, OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.27-1.68,

Indexed as

community health workers (Agents de santé à Base communautaire – ASBCs)contraceptive useeducationmodern family planningmultivariable logistic regressionsociocultural barriers

Identifiers

PMID41783767
PMCPMC12953070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.