Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783635›Full record

Observational studyJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025

Clinical Characteristics of Patients Undergoing D2 Gastrectomy with Bursectomy in Gastric Cancer Patients: An Observational Study.

Sundar Shrestha, Jainendra Kumar Chaudhary, Sharad Pokhrel, Indra Kumar Jha, Niroj Banepali, Samyukta K C

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sundar ShresthaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jainendra Kumar ChaudharyDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sharad PokhrelDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Indra Kumar JhaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Niroj BanepaliDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Samyukta K CDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Bir Hospital, National Academy of Medical Sciences, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gastric cancer is a significant global and national health problem with high incidence and mortality rates. Despite advancements in treatment, local recurrence, mainly peritoneal, is common. Bursectomy, once the standard of surgery in resectable GC to reduce recurrence by removing the peritoneal membranes' micro-metastasis, poses risks like pancreatic injury. Japanese guidelines now advise against it due to limited survival benefits, recommending D2 dissection with omentectomy instead. However, bursectomy is still routinely practiced in Nepal. This study evaluates its relevance, risks, and compliance with global guidelines. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at Bir Hospital from March 2024 to May 2025, involving 35 patients with resectable stage Ib-III gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy with bursectomy. Ethical approval was obtained from NAMS IRB. Patients with poor performance status or metastasis were excluded. All procedures were performed by experienced consultant surgical gastroenterologists, and specimens were sent separately for examination. Results: Among 39 selected patients, 35 underwent curative D2 gastrectomy with bursectomy. Among them, 20 (57.14%) were male, with a mean age of 60.54±13.81 years and performance status 0-2. 33 (94.28%) patients had distal gastric lesions; among them, 27 (77.13%) patients had cT3+cT4 lesions. Tumor deposits in the bursa were seen in 3(8.57%) patients. There were procedure-specific complications like 2(5.71%) biochemical leaks, delayed 4(11.43%) gastric emptying, and 3(8.57%) postoperative ileus. There was no mortality. 18 (51.42%) patients were followed up for more than 6 months. Conclusions: There are tumor deposits in the bursa, and bursectomy doesn't increase the post-operative complications.

Indexed as

GastrectomyStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingNepalPostoperative Complicationsbursectomygastric cancertumor deposits

Identifiers

PMID41783635
PMCPMC12860670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.