Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783621›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies2025

Enabling Older Adults to Provide High-quality Activity Labels: Unpacking Accuracy, Precision, and Granularity in Activity Labeling.

Yiwen Wang, Hossein Khayami, Bongshin Lee, Amanda Lazar, Hernisa Kacorri, Eun Kyoung Choe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yiwen WangUniversity of Maryland, College Park, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1234-7621
Hossein KhayamiUniversity of Maryland, College Park, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4485-9322
Bongshin LeeYonsei University, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-627X
Amanda LazarUniversity of Maryland, College Park, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8110-4239
Hernisa KacorriUniversity of Maryland, College Park, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7798-308X
Eun Kyoung ChoeUniversity of Maryland, College Park, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5038-8320

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality labels of activity data with broad representations and real-world variability are key to developing activity recognition models tailored to the needs and characteristics of older adults. However, labeling real-world data presents significant challenges, placing a heavy burden on users to provide high-quality labels while staying engaged in their activities. This paper investigates older adults' perceptions of providing high-quality labels in the context of training their personalized activity trackers. We conducted a co-design study with 12 older adults to envision the labeling process-describing activity names and time spans-using the teachable machines paradigm as a scaffold. We unpack the contextualized definitions of accuracy, precision, and granularity through a thematic analysis of older adults' perspectives on activity labeling. Our findings present participants' preferred strategies for obtaining high-quality activity labels with less burden and intrusiveness, including user-initiated labeling and machine-initiated prompting. We discuss design considerations for future data labeling tools that address discrepancies between user perceptions and technical standards in training personalized activity trackers.

Indexed as

Activity trackingCo-designData labelingHuman activity recognitionLabel qualityMachine teachingOlder adultsPersonalization

Identifiers

PMID41783621
PMCPMC12955817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.