Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783610›Full record

ArticleASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies2025

Exploring Collaboration to Center the Deaf Community in Sign Language AI.

Rie Kamikubo, Abraham Glasser, Alex X Lu, Hal Daumé, Hernisa Kacorri, Danielle Bragg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ASSETS. Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rie KamikuboUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Abraham GlasserGallaudet University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Alex X LuMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Hal DauméUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Hernisa KacorriUniversity of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Danielle BraggMicrosoft Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0008ACL HHS 90REGE0024ACL HHS 90REGE0027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign language processing holds great promise for advancing societal inclusivity, yet it often excludes meaningful participation from the Deaf community, raising ethical and practical concerns about the applicability of AI solutions to their needs. This paper addresses these gaps through two interrelated studies. First, surveys identify differences in priorities and expectations between machine learning (ML) practitioners and Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) signers. Second, paired co-design sessions bring ML and ASL experts together to generate guiding questions that support practices for aligning AI development with community goals. Our findings reveal critical points of friction that reflect deeper systemic and epistemic barriers to effective collaboration. By synthesizing unique and shared insights from both groups, we provide empirically grounded resources to guide collaborative frameworks that promote the agency and expertise of the Deaf community. This research paves actionable pathways toward equitable, community-centered advancements in AI.

Indexed as

Deaf and Hard of HearingInterdisciplinary CollaborationMachine LearningSign Language Technology

Identifiers

PMID41783610
PMCPMC12955818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.