Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783573›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026

Sustained Release of Ropivacaine from Adhesive Injectable Microbubbles with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Pain Management: An Animal Model Study.

Hui-Jie Shang, Hao-Tian Ye, Cai-Bao Yue, Mu-Huo Ji, Han-Wen Gu, Wei-Tong Pan, Pan-Miao Liu, Jian-Jun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hui-Jie Shang *Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-5457-5135
Hao-Tian Ye *Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.
Cai-Bao YueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.
Mu-Huo JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210003, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-6436
Han-Wen GuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Tong PanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.
Pan-Miao LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Jun YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-6785-9627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Perioperative pain poses a significant challenge for surgical patients, with regional anesthesia commonly employed for postoperative pain relief. However, the utility of regional anesthesia is limited by the lack of real-time visualization during drug delivery and the rapid diffusion of anesthetics, which result in imprecise targeting and short duration of analgesia. Methods: An innovative ultrasound-guided drug sustained-release capsules were fabricated by bioinspired adhesive polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) loaded with ropivacaine microbubbles (APRMs). Ropivacaine release and ultrasonographic experiments of APRMs were conducted in vitro. For in vivo evaluation, a total of 127 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g) were used. Then, incision surgery and SNI-induced neuropathic pain were conducted for adult male rats to verify the ropivacaine release of APRMs in vivo. Ultrasound imaging was performed to confirm the ultrasonic visualization of APRMs. The in vivo fluorescence imaging experiment was conducted for the adhesion property of APRMs. Finally, systemic toxicity and tissue reaction were histologically evaluated. Results: APRMs achieved real-time visualization during drug delivery and significantly prolonged antinociceptive effects, maintaining mechanical analgesia for 9 days and thermal analgesia for up to 15 days, whereas free ropivacaine produced only transient effects (mechanical: approximately 24 h; thermal: approximately 4 h). Histological assessments revealed no toxicity or adverse tissue reactions, underscoring the safety of APRMs. Conclusion: APRMs represent a novel and promising strategy for pain management by integrating sustained anesthetic release, bioinspired adhesive properties for prolonged retention, and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for real-time visualization. While these findings are encouraging, further in vivo validation and extended preclinical studies will be essential to confirm safety and efficacy before considering translation into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalContrast MediaMicrobubblesPain ManagementRopivacaineAdhesivesAnimalsDelayed-Action PreparationsDisease Models, AnimalMalePolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUltrasonographyAdhesivesAnesthetics, LocalContrast MediaDelayed-Action PreparationsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerRopivacainemicrobubblespain managementpolydopamineropivacaine

Identifiers

PMID41783573
PMCPMC12956063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.