Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783529›Full record

Observational studyJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2026

Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Postpartum Nepalese Women: An Observational Study.

Manisha Yadav, Sandesh Poudel, Shree Prasad Adhikari

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manisha YadavParopakar Maternity and Women's Hospital, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sandesh PoudelParopakar Maternity and Women's Hospital, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shree Prasad AdhikariParopakar Maternity and Women's Hospital, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions (PFD) have been strongly associated with vaginal birth and can significantly affect women's quality of life. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PFDs during the postpartum period and its impact on women's daily activities. Methods: A hospital-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among 747 primiparous women at 9-12 months postpartum, who had delivered term live baby from July to September 2021. The different components of PFD were evaluated using a Nepali translated version of PFDI-20 and the impact on sexual function by BFLUTS questionnaire. The primary outcome was women's self-reported occurrence of urinary, prolapse, defecatory and sexual problems. The impact on women's daily activities was secondary outcomes. Data were analyzed by Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient. Results: Among 747 primiparous women, 194 (25.97%) had pelvic floor dysfunction. The mean age was 23.01±3.6 years, with 94 (48.45%) of PFD cases aged 20-24 years. Stress urinary incontinence was reported by 103 (53.09%), pelvic heaviness by 48 (24.74%), straining during defecation by 23 (11.86%), and dyspareunia by 54 (27.84%). Most women 137 (70.61%) reported no impact on daily life, and 18 (2.40%) were aware of pelvic floor muscle training. Conclusions: Pelvic floor dysfunction affected a notable proportion of primiparous women, with urinary, prolapse-related, colorectal, and sexual symptoms. Most affected women were young, and labour characteristics such as spontaneous onset, vaginal delivery, and shorter second stage were common.

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersPostpartum PeriodAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDyspareuniaFemaleHumansNepalPregnancyPrevalenceQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultpelvic floor dysfunctionspostpartumprevalenceprimiparousurinary incontinencevaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID41783529
PMCPMC12925829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.