ReviewOTO open
Tongue Reduction for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review.
Review in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent pediatric disorder that, if untreated, can result in substantial developmental and health consequences. Tongue reduction procedures, such as midline posterior glossectomy (MPG), are increasingly used to address tongue base obstruction. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness and safety of tongue reduction procedures for pediatric OSA. Data Sources: Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were queried for studies from inception to September 20, 2023. Review Methods: Studies reporting on outcomes of pediatric patients (≤21 years) undergoing tongue reduction surgery for OSA were included. Results: From 477 abstracts, 9 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 146 pediatric patients. Surgical techniques included MPG, transoral robotic-assisted tongue base resection, and keyhole partial glossectomy. Primary outcomes assessed were apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), minimum oxygen saturation, and adverse events. All studies reported a reduction in AHI and increased minimum oxygen saturation following tongue reduction despite the method. Adverse events appear to be rare but included postoperative bleeding, need for reintubation, and wound dehiscence. Conclusion: Tongue reduction procedures appear to be safe and effective for managing pediatric OSA, improving key clinical outcomes. However, long-term results, comparative studies of surgical techniques, and refined patient selection criteria are needed. Future research should also identify risk factors for persistent OSA following tongue base reduction. These findings suggest that tongue reduction is a valuable addition to the treatment arsenal for pediatric OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.