Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783462›Full record

ArticlePNAS nexus2026

Gender equality predicts female overrepresentation only in competitive domains where they have a relative advantage over males.

Allon Vishkin, Rachel Krasner, Majd Wely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allon VishkinFaculty of Data and Decision Sciences, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9655-7449
Rachel KrasnerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02138, USA.
Majd WelyDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0095-4695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nature and nurture perspectives of the gender-equality paradox frequently talk past each other because they do not share underlying assumptions regarding which sex differences are inherent. We overcome this limitation by investigating the consequences of a sex difference both perspectives agree is inherent: physical size. We leveraged equestrian sports as a unique test case in which males and females compete together and in which smaller physical size provides a competitive advantage. Findings showed that gender equality is a stronger predictor of female representation in equestrian sports and that countries high in gender equality have the most extreme overrepresentation of female equestrians, compared with table tennis, judo, swimming, or sailing (total

Indexed as

competitionculturegender equalitysex differences

Identifiers

PMID41783462
PMCPMC12954172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.