ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Implementation of early peanut introduction among providers in a southern US state.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Peanut allergy prevention guidelines recommend early dietary introduction among infants in the first year of life, yet implementation remains limited. Objective: This study's purpose was to assess guideline implementation and identify barriers and needs among pediatric providers in a largely rural state in the southern United States. Methods: A 21-item, anonymous survey was given to pediatric providers in the Arkansas Children's Care Network to assess implementation of the 2017 National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease guidelines. Survey invitations were sent via e-mail link between May 2022 and December 2023. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the results were assessed in aggregate as well as by urban or rural practice location. Results: Of 130 providers, 35 (27%) responded (62% urban and 38% rural). All respondents reported guideline familiarity, yet only 37% reported full implementation and 41% estimated that less than 50% of caregivers introduce peanut at home. The top barriers to early peanut introduction included conducting in-office peanut feedings (60%), lack of clinic time (41%), and parental concerns for allergic reactions (31%). The primary barriers to allergist referral differed by practice locale as follows: timely access was mentioned by 86% of respondents (cited by more urban providers than rural providers), and distance from home was mentioned by 54% of respondents (cited by more rural than urban providers). The top resource needs included parental handouts on home feeding (cited by 72% of respondents), guides to assessment and/or recommendations (cited by 62%), online tutorials (cited by 57%), and scripts for explaining guidelines (cited by 44%). Conclusion: Pediatric providers in Arkansas reported guideline awareness but suboptimal implementation (defined largely as practice-based resource limitations and parental hesitancy, factors that were heightened among providers based in rural areas). These findings demonstrate a need for accessible, efficient resources and toolkits tailored to providers' unique needs, with innovative strategies to expand allergists' reach (particularly in rural settings).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.