Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783433›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026

Elevated lipoprotein(a) and adverse outcomes in advanced coronary artery calcification: An intravascular ultrasound study.

Shaowu Xiao, Mengya Zeng, Junru He, Dabao Xiao, Yuewu Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lipoprotein(a) and premature myocardial infarction: Mechanistic insights and implications for PCI-era residual risk.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Review
  2. Is lipoprotein(a) driving events or marking risk in advanced coronary calcification?International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaowu XiaoDepartment of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570103, China.
Mengya ZengDepartment of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570103, China.
Junru HeDepartment of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570103, China.
Dabao XiaoHainan Medical University, Haikou, 571199, China.
Yuewu ChenDepartment of Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, 570103, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) signifies advanced atherosclerosis and portends increased cardiovascular risk. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for atherosclerosis; however, its association with in vivo lesion morphology and clinical outcomes in patients with symptomatic, advanced CAC remains incompletely characterized. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and both in vivo lesion morphology and clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, 292 patients with intravascular ultrasound(IVUS)-confirmed CAC were stratified into elevated (≥50 mg/dL,n = 77) or low (<50 mg/dL,n = 215) Lp(a) groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Associations were assessed via multivariable Cox models adjusted for clinical covariates. Results: Patients in the elevated Lp(a) group presented a greater incidence of aortic valve calcification (p < 0.001). IVUS revealed constrictive remodeling with a smaller lumen and vessel dimensions. During a median follow-up of 17.2 months, the elevated Lp(a) cohort had a significantly higher MACE rate (37.7% vs. 15.8%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.60, 95% CI 1.55-4.35, p < 0.001). Elevated Lp(a) independently predicted increased risks of ischemic stroke (aHR 7.14) and in-stent restenosis (aHR 2.78). Conclusion: In symptomatic patients with IVUS-confirmed CAC, elevated Lp(a) identifies a high-risk phenotype characterized by constrictive vascular remodeling and a markedly increased risk of MACEs, driven particularly by ischemic stroke and in-stent restenosis. These findings support the integration of routine Lp(a) testing into the risk stratification of patients with severe CAC, thereby identifying a precise high-risk phenotype that warrants intensified monitoring and represents an ideal target for emerging Lp(a)-lowering therapies.

Indexed as

Constrictive remodelingCoronary artery calcificationIntravascular ultrasoundLipoprotein(a)Major adverse cardiovascular events

Identifiers

PMID41783433
PMCPMC12955567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.