ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Comparison of High-tensile Suture and 16-gauge Wire for Prophylactic Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prophylactic cerclage fixation may reduce fracture risk after total hip arthroplasty. Traditionally performed with wire or cables, high-tensile suture is a novel alternative not previously evaluated. This study compared peak torque to failure of cemented and cementless femoral stems using either 16-gauge wire or high-tensile suture in a synthetic femur model. Methods: Sixteen collarless triple-taper (TT) stems (8 calcar wire, 8 calcar suture) and 27 taper-slip (TS) stems were tested: 7 each with calcar suture, diaphyseal wire, and diaphyseal suture, and 6 with calcar wire (one excluded). Stems were press-fit or cemented into composite femora. Fixation was applied above the lesser trochanter (calcar) or 2 cm below (diaphyseal). Sutures were tensioned to 80 N. A servohydraulic system applied a 2000 N load with 1°/s internal rotation until failure. Power analysis supported 7 specimens per group to detect a 30 Nm difference. Two-sample and noninferiority Results: For TT stems, peak torque was 92.7 ± 11.4 Nm with calcar wire and 102.6 ± 41.4 Nm with calcar suture; suture was noninferior (P = .038). For TS stems, torque was 148.2 ± 38.6 Nm (calcar wire), 118.3 ± 30.2 Nm (calcar suture), 164.9 ± 21.5 Nm (diaphyseal wire), and 159.4 ± 30.0 Nm (diaphyseal suture). Noninferiority in TS stems was not established. Diaphyseal suture exceeded calcar suture ( Conclusions: High-tensile suture was comparable to wire for calcar fixation in collarless TT stems. In TS stems, noninferiority was not demonstrated. Suture constructs may offer practical advantages and warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.