ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Algorithmic anxiety: AI, work, and the evolving psychological contract in digital discourse.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological Contracts and Emotional Labor in the Age of AI: A Moderated Mediation Model.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A bridge, not a destination: YouTube viewer perspectives on AI mental health support and human therapy.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Can't help falling in love… with a bot? A mixed-methods analysis of public discourses of AI intimacy and companionship on YouTube.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The study used a mixed-methods approach, utilising 1,454 Reddit narratives about AI-driven job displacement, to examine how AI is transforming the workplace psychological contract. Methods: This study used both quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis. It analysed sentiment patterns, emotional responses, and thematic content from digital discourse. Results: While our results show a surface level of optimism regarding the use of AI (52% of all sentiment was positive according to VADER), our results also showed a significant amount of negative sentiment (51% of all sentiment was negative according to BERT) that indicates a deeper concern of people in terms of their feelings of "algorithmic anxiety" related to job loss. Network analysis showed three interconnected discourse groups centered on employment disruption, ethical concerns, and technical systems (modularity Q = 0.42). Furthermore, seven themes emerged from the data analysis: shattered trust and corporate betrayal, eroded identities, technostress, devalued expertise, anxiety about the future, cynicism about adapting, and affirming human values, which illustrate how the use of AI has disrupted the psychological contract between employees and employers. Discussion: This study adds to psychological contract theory by illustrating ways that technology can breach an individual's psychological contract at work. In addition, this study extends existing technostress literature by identifying specific sources of stress associated with AI use in the workplace. Finally, it applies self-determination theory to work settings where algorithms are shaping the work environment. Practically speaking, the findings suggest that employers who wish to address the growing problem of "algorithmic anxiety" should engage in transparent communication, involve employees in decision-making, and design their technological systems to preserve employee dignity in increasingly automated workplaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.