SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on anxiety and depression in patients with myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anxiety and depressive symptoms are highly prevalent comorbidities among patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a well-established intervention for depression, its efficacy in MI patients remains inconclusive. Objective: To evaluate the effects of CBT on anxiety, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality in patients following MI. Design: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The study followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for reporting. Methods: Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating CBT in patients with MI. Two independent researchers screened the literature, assessed study quality, and extracted data based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate mean differences, with statistical analyses conducted using Stata 15.0. Results: Eleven RCTs involving 1,575 participants were included. The findings showed that CBT led to greater improvements in anxiety and depressive symptoms compared with control interventions. In addition, CBT significantly improved sleep quality among patients after MI. Conclusion: CBT is associated with improvements in psychological and sleep outcomes following MI. However, the existing evidence shows high variability and heterogeneity. Further large-scale, high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings and develop standardized protocols for implementing CBT in this patient population. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42025636352, identifier CRD42025636352.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.