ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Why should I use social chatbots? On potential users' acceptance and the role of anthropomorphism.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chatbots can provide task-related services but also act as empathic conversation partners allowing for social interactions. Focusing on such social chatbots, we considered several theoretical frameworks to investigate potential users' intention to use social chatbots and focused on the role of anthropomorphism. Method: Based on an online survey with 180 participants, we examined the role of 14 personal characteristics in potential users' acceptance of social chatbots based on bivariate correlations and multiple regression analysis. Based on a subsequent within-subjects experiment and repeated measures analysis of variance, we also investigated differences in the intention of potential users to use more human-like versus less human-like social chatbots regarding their avatar and name. Results: Most personal characteristics were significantly correlated with participants' intention to use social chatbots. The multiple regression model explained about 75% of variance in participants' intention and identified experience and attitude regarding social chatbots as particularly important personal characteristics. Further, perceived usefulness, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control regarding social chatbots as well as social support showed specifically strong bivariate correlations. The experimental part revealed that more human-like social chatbots received slightly yet significantly higher intention ratings. Discussion: We identified relevant personal characteristics for potential users' intention to use social chatbots and found that potential users prefer using social chatbots with a more human-like appearance. While anthropomorphism can affect potential users' intention to use social chatbots, other aspects seem more important. Overall, our findings provide valuable starting points to better understand why people intend to use social chatbots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.