ArticleDigital health
The forecasting of pediatric asthma clinic visits: A comparative analysis of time-series models under varying training set sizes.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to identify the optimal time-series models and training strategies for forecasting daily pediatric asthma visit volumes and explore the impact of varying training set sizes on model performance to provide a data-driven framework for clinical resource allocation. Methods: This paper compares the performance of four representative time-series models (autoregressive integrated moving average, Prophet, extreme gradient boosting, bidirectional long short-term memory) in forecasting pediatric asthma daily visits and investigates the impact of varying training set sizes on model performance. A retrospective study was conducted using daily pediatric asthma visit data from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2019, at a large tertiary children's hospital in Chongqing, China. Four representative time-series models were constructed and evaluated under two forecasting strategies (rolling and direct forecasting) with varying training set sizes (3 years, 2 years, 1 year, 6 months, 1 month). The models were evaluated using metrics including the coefficient of determination R Results: The experimental results indicate that extreme gradient boosting and bidirectional long short-term memory are reliable for pediatric asthma visit forecasting, with 2-year training data and rolling forecasting optimal. Ensemble method combining the above two models reduced error days compared to single models. Conclusion: This research presents a robust framework for hospitals to implement data-driven forecasting of pediatric asthma visit volumes, integrating machine learning models and deep learning model with adaptive training strategies to improve the efficiency of resource management in this clinical domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.