Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783279›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

The functional gait deviation index.

Sajal Kaur Minhas, Morgan Sangeux, Julia Polak, Michelle Carey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sajal Kaur MinhasSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.
Morgan SangeuxUniversity Children's Hospital Basel, Department of Orthopaedics, Basel, Switzerland.
Julia PolakSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle CareySchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A typical gait analysis requires the examination of the motion of nine joint angles on the left-hand side and six joint angles on the right-hand side across multiple subjects. Due to the quantity and complexity of the data, it is useful to calculate the amount by which a subject's gait deviates from an average normal profile and to represent this deviation as a single number. Such a measure can quantify the overall severity of a condition affecting walking, monitor progress, or evaluate the outcome of an intervention prescribed to improve the gait pattern. The gait deviation index, gait profile score, and the overall abnormality measure are standard benchmarks for quantifying gait abnormality. However, these indices do not account for the intrinsic smoothness of the gait movement at each joint/plane and the potential co-variation between the joints/planes. Utilizing a multivariate functional principal component analysis we propose the functional gait deviation index (FGDI). FGDI accounts for the intrinsic smoothness of the gait movement at each joint/plane and the potential co-variation between the joints. We show that FGDI scales with overall gait function, provides a consistent measure of gait abnormality, and is implemented easily using an interactive web app.

Indexed as

62H2562R10biomechanicsfunctional data analysisgait pathologyKinematicsmultivariate functional principal components

Identifiers

PMID41783279
PMCPMC12954805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.