Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783266›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

Controlling the fate of two triplet states: solid-state annihilator design for photon upconversion.

Jussi Isokuortti, Lea Nienhaus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jussi IsokuorttiDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University Houston Texas 77005 USA ji30@rice.edu ln27@rice.edu.
Lea NienhausDepartment of Chemistry, Rice University Houston Texas 77005 USA ji30@rice.edu ln27@rice.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1412-412X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photon upconversion, the process of converting low-energy light into higher-energy photons, offers transformative opportunities for energy conversion and optoelectronics. In this Perspective, we examine the molecular design principles of solid-state annihilators, emphasizing a unified excitonic framework that links upconversion with related technologies such as organic light-emitting diodes and singlet fission. We discuss key challenges, including controlling triplet exciton diffusion, maximizing singlet formation efficiency, and suppressing loss channels such as excimer and trap-state formation. Strategies that leverage precise intermolecular packing and tailored electronic coupling are highlighted as critical levers for dictating excited-state dynamics and optimizing photophysical outcomes. Looking forward, we propose that future breakthroughs will surpass the "solution-first approach" and hinge on integrating data-driven machine learning approaches with phonon engineering to rationally design materials with enhanced light emission and energy conversion efficiency. This framework provides guiding principles for the next generation of high-performance solid-state upconversion systems.

Identifiers

PMID41783266
PMCPMC12954615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.