Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783249›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Texture preference task: a rapid and training-independent behavioural assay to evaluate somatosensory perception in freely moving mice.

Jessika Royea, Ismaël Djerourou, Behiye Sanliturk, Catherine Albert, Matthieu P Vanni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessika RoyeaÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 3744 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Ismaël DjerourouÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 3744 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Behiye SanliturkÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 3744 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Catherine AlbertÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 3744 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Matthieu P VanniÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Pavillon 3744 rue Jean-Brillant, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensory perception, mediated though the whiskers and paws, plays a critical role in how rodents explore and interact with their environment. Whereas strokes are associated with devastating motor deficits, they also frequently disrupt tactile processing, yet most commonly used behavioural assays emphasize gross motor coordination rather than spontaneously driven sensory behaviour. To address this gap, we developed a simple open-field texture preference assay for mice. The task leverages innate exploratory behaviour, requires no training, and provides a rapid automated measure of tactile preference before and after cortical stroke. Here, we offer a reproducible and accessible approach for assessing post-stroke somatosensory deficits. Essential highlights Provides a non-invasive and training-free assay of tactile preference in freely moving mice. Enables sensitive detection of post-stroke sensory impairments that complement standard motor tests. Adaptable for diverse experimental contexts, including recovery studies and therapeutic interventions. Overall, this protocol offers an efficient, low-cost addition to behavioural testing batteries in preclinical stroke research. Beyond stroke, the task may be broadly applicable to studies of tactile processing, sensory preference, and environmental enrichment in freely moving mice.

Indexed as

Environmental preferenceOpen-field testPhotothrombosisSomatosensory behaviourStrokeTactile perceptionTexture preference

Identifiers

PMID41783249
PMCPMC12955191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.