Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783201›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2026

Complications and clinical benefits of the combined supra- and infraclavicular approach in neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome.

Iván Federico Narváez Moscoso, Miguel Domínguez Páez, Miguel Segura Fernández-Nogueras, Miguel Ángel Arráez Sánchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Iván Federico Narváez MoscosoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Miguel Domínguez PáezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Miguel Segura Fernández-NoguerasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Arráez SánchezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to analyze whether the combined supra- and infraclavicular approach for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS) increases postoperative complications and to determine whether its anatomical advantages translate into improved clinical outcomes without increasing morbidity when compared to isolated supraclavicular approaches. Methods: A retrospective study of 69 procedures performed for nTOS between 2015 and 2024 by a single neurosurgeon. Surgical approaches, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results were compared between the combined and isolated supraclavicular approaches using Chi-square testing and logistic regression models. Results: The overall complication rate was 18.8% (13/69). Complications occurred in 22.5% of combined procedures (9/40) and 12.0% of isolated supraclavicular procedures (3/25), with no statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Although the combined approach presents a numerically higher complication rate, the difference is not statistically significant, and all complications were transient. Its superior anatomical exposure and higher rate of clinical improvement support the combined approach as a safe and advantageous surgical option for patients with suspected multilevel nTOS compression.

Indexed as

Brachial plexusSurgical proceduresThoracic outlet syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41783201
PMCPMC12954216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.