Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783163›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2026

Randomized controlled trial on feedback-informed internet-delivered psychodynamic therapy for adolescents with depression: A trial that failed to recruit enough participants.

Björn Philips, Jakob Mechler, Carl-Johan Uckelstam, Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring, Julian Edbrook-Childs, Fredrik Falkenström, Robert Johansson, Peter Lilliengren, Katja Lindert Bergsten and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06193772 (Increasing Treatment Response Rates in Depressed Adolescents Via Feedback-Informed Internet-Delivered Psychodynamic Therapy - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06193772 nacompletednot on this map

Increasing Treatment Response Rates in Depressed Adolescents Via Feedback-Informed Internet-Delivered Psychodynamic Therapy - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBjörn PhilipsRan2024 to 2024Enrolled35ConditionsDepression in AdolescenceArmsInternet-delivered psychodynamic therapy (IPDT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Björn PhilipsDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jakob MechlerDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl-Johan UckelstamDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gerhard AnderssonDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Per CarlbringDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Julian Edbrook-ChildsDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK.
Fredrik FalkenströmDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Robert JohanssonDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter LilliengrenDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Katja Lindert BergstenDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nick MidgleyEvidence Based Practice Unit, Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Rolf SandellDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Agneta ThorénThe Erica Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
Naira TopoocoDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Randi UlbergUniversity of Oslo, Oslo. Norway.
Karin LindqvistDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Internet-delivered psychodynamic therapy (IPDT) has been found to be effective for adolescents with depression in previous randomized controlled trials. The present study aimed to evaluate an adaptive, feedback-informed version of IPDT, designed to improve outcomes for participants identified early as at risk of non-response. Methods: A randomized controlled trial targeting adolescents aged 15-19 years with mild to moderate major depressive disorder. Participants were recruited through social media, national and local advertising, schools, and user organizations. After three weeks of standard IPDT, participants classified as at risk by a prediction algorithm were randomized to either adapted or standard treatment. The planned sample size was 240 participants. Despite extensive nationwide recruitment efforts during 2024, only 35 participants were enrolled before the study was discontinued. Results: Recruitment difficulties were primarily due to recent European Union regulations prohibiting profiling-based online advertising for minors, which eliminated access to previously effective social media recruitment channels. Participants who completed treatment showed significant pre- to post-treatment improvements in depressive symptoms ( Conclusions: Although the trial was underpowered, the findings provide promising within-group effects and valuable lessons for future digital mental health research involving minors. New recruitment infrastructures that comply with data protection laws are needed to ensure feasibility of online psychotherapy trials. Continued development of adaptive, feedback-informed IPDT for adolescents with depression is needed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06193772.

Indexed as

Adaptive interventionAdolescent depressionDigital mental healthFeedback-informed treatmentInternet-delivered psychotherapyPsychodynamic therapyRecruitment challenges

Identifiers

PMID41783163
PMCPMC12954187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.