Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41783127›Full record

ReviewACS central science2026

Synergizing Chemical and AI Communities for Advancing Laboratories of the Future.

Saejin Oh, Xinyi Fang, I-Hsin Lin, Paris Dee, Christopher S Dunham, Stacy M Copp, Abigail G Doyle, Javier Read de Alaniz, Mengyang Gu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS central science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Saejin OhBioPACIFIC Materials Innovation Platform, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Xinyi FangDepartment of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
I-Hsin LinDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Paris DeeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.
Christopher S DunhamBioPACIFIC Materials Innovation Platform, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Stacy M CoppDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Abigail G DoyleDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6641-0833
Javier Read de AlanizDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2770-9477
Mengyang GuDepartment of Statistics and Applied Probability, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-8965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of automated experimental facilities and the digitization of experimental data have introduced numerous opportunities to radically advance chemical laboratories. As many laboratory tasks involve predicting and understanding previously unknown chemical relationships, machine learning (ML) approaches trained on experimental data can substantially accelerate the conventional design-build-test-learn process. This outlook article aims to help chemists understand and begin to adopt ML predictive models for a variety of laboratory tasks, including experimental design, synthesis optimization, and materials characterization. Furthermore, this article introduces how artificial intelligence (AI) agents based on large language models can help researchers acquire background knowledge in chemical or data science and accelerate various aspects of the discovery process. We present three case studies in distinct areas to illustrate how ML models and AI agents can be leveraged to reduce time-consuming experiments and manual data analysis. Finally, we highlight existing challenges that require continued synergistic effort from both experimental and computational communities to address.

Identifiers

PMID41783127
PMCPMC12956031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.