ArticleOphthalmology science2026
A Multimodal Multitask Artificial Intelligence Model for Orthokeratology Contact Lens Fitting: An Integrated Framework to Enhance Lens Centration and Myopia Control Effect.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a multimodal, multitask artificial intelligence (AI) model to classify postfitting corneal topography patterns and predict axial length (AL) growth, while simultaneously outputting optimal orthokeratology (ortho-K) lens parameters and the predicted probability of axial growth to support clinical decisions. Design: A retrospective analysis. Subjects: Clinical data and corneal topography maps from 3529 myopic eyes fitted with ortho-K lenses (Euclid or Alpha designs) from 2018 to 2023 were collected. Methods: A novel AI model was built comprising (1) a ResNet50-based "recall" model to predict key lens parameters and (2) a multimodal multitask "ranking" model (comparing ResNet50, ViT-B/16, and CLIP-ViT architectures) to classify postlens corneal topography and predict axial elongation. Postlens topography pattern was classified by centration and plus power ring pattern. Annual axial elongation rate ≥0.3 mm/y is defined as fast myopia progression. The recall model output gave a list of optimal lens parameter candidates, and the ranking model output the likely topography classification and the probability of AL growth for each candidate at 1 year. Main Outcome Measures: Mean squared error, recall rate, and accuracy were measured to evaluate model performance. Results: Of the 3529 ortho-K fits, 2643 eyes (74.89%) wore Euclid lenses and 886 (25.11%) wore Alpha lenses. All subjects wore their ortho-K lenses over the study period without serious complications. The average spherical equivalent refraction was -2.91 ± 1.14 diopters, and mean lens wear period was 11 months (range 9-13 months). Uncorrected visual acuity ≥0.8 was achieved in 96.43% of eyes at 1 month. The overall annual axial elongation rate observed was 0.24 ± 0.20 mm/y. Class 1 axial growth (<0.3 mm/y) in 62.79% of eyes, and class 1 postlens topography was achieved in 80.0% of eyes at 1-year follow-up. All 3 ranking models performed comparably: topography classification accuracies were 0.95, 0.96, and 0.96 for ResNet50, ViT, and CLIP-ViT models, respectively; while axial growth prediction accuracies were 0.880, 0.882, and 0.883, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed multimodal multitask AI model performed well in classifying corneal topography patterns, predicting AL growth rate, and recommending lens parameters, offering valuable decision support in ortho-K lens fitting. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.