ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026
Feasibility of Ecological Momentary Assessment in the Indian Context to Address Challenges Associated with Hearing-Aid Use.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) involves the repeated real-time or near real-time sampling of individuals' behaviors and experiences within their natural settings, offering insights into the daily challenges experienced by individuals with hearing impairment. Objective: The study aims to evaluate EMA's feasibility and construct validity in the Indian context, assessing its effectiveness in analyzing hearing aid outcomes at different times. Methods: Twelve participants, aged between 49 and 66 (mean: 57.83) years, with bilateral hearing loss, participated in the study. A prospective cohort study was conducted from July to November 2023. Ecological momentary assessments were administered using a questionnaire hosted on Microsoft Forms (Microsoft Corp.), with links sent via WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.) 3 times daily over 10 days. On average, participants completed 3 surveys daily, each consisting of 15 questions. Results: A total of 237 entries was collected, with a 65.83% compliance rate. Most entries highlighted the evident advantages of hearing aids, especially in quiet surroundings. Utilizing Friedman's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for comparative analysis, significant variations were observed in EMA entries over time within identical listening environments. Conclusion: The benefits of hearing aids in quiet environments were emphasized due to their capacity to restore audibility. The significant variations in individual preferences within the same environment emphasize the necessity for personalized hearing aid settings. These discrepancies in EMA entries highlight the importance of incorporating objective background noise measurements in surveys to optimize hearing aid performance. Ecological momentary assessment surveys provide valuable insights into listener preferences, facilitating optimal adjustments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.