ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2026
Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hidden SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infections in Young Children: What Routine Tests Do Not Tell.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused a global emergency. Screening protocols vary regarding the epidemiological situation and the dominant virus variant. Implementing these protocols can be particularly challenging in young children. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in small children. Furthermore, hidden severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron infections, missed by routine PCR testing, were intraoperatively analyzed, and multiple testing methods were compared. Methods: The present prospective cohort study was performed between March and May 2022. All children aged ≤ 6 years who were admitted for adenoidectomy and/or tonsillotomy to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery of the Saint Elisabeth Hospital, in Bochum, Germany, were included. Routine PCR swabs were performed ≤ 24 hours before surgery. Intraoperatively, rapid antigen tests, separate naso- and oropharyngeal PCR swabs, adenoid and/or tonsillar tissue for PCR analysis, and serological tests were collected. Results: We included 55 children with negative preoperative PCR tests. Intraoperatively, SARS-CoV-2 particles were detected in 51% of the sample. Among children without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection within 90 days before surgery, the prevalence was 43%. Compared with the PCR results regarding tissue, the preoperative PCR screening had a sensitivity of 20%, and, in the intraoperative PCR screening, the optimally performed swabs had a sensitivity of 79%. In total, 29% of the positive cases had a cycle threshold (Ct) value < 30. Nasopharyngeal PCR tests detected significantly more SARS-CoV-2 infections than oropharyngeal swabs. Conclusion: Routine PCR tests in infants may present a high rate of false-negative results and a low sensitivity. These findings question preoperative screening protocols that include testing asymptomatic children who have recovered from a recent SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.