ArticleBrain & spine2026
Evaluation of pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from preoperative planning in intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Navigated lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective study.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Computer-Assisted Screw Trajectory Planning Model Based on Iterative Closest Point Registration and Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors Algorithms for Cortical Bone and Pedicle Screw Techniques.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Enhancing precision in robotic navigated minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a streamlined surgical workflow: a technical note.Brain & spine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Preoperative planning using navigation systems allows the surgeon to optimize pedicle screw placement, minimizing the risk of misplacement. Research question: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of pedicle screws placement, and the deviation of final position compared to preoperative planning using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) navigation system. Material and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with TLIF technique for degenerative spondylolisthesis using intraoperative imaging navigation system. Accuracy and superior facet joint violation (FJV) were assessed following Gertzbein and Robbins system (GRS) and Yson classification, respectively. Deviation from planning was calculated by linear, angular and 3D deviations between planned and implanted screws. The comparison of continuous variables by GRS was performed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test. The association between vertebral level and screw deviations was evaluated using ANOVA analysis. Results: The study included 40 patients with a mean age of 62.8 years. Of 180 pedicle screws implanted, 177 (98.30%) were clinically acceptable (GRS A + B) and 97.50% were classified as Yson grade 0. ANOVA reported statistically significant results between GRS and tip deviations in lateral-medial (p = 0.005), antero-posterior (p = 0.01) and 3D (p = 0.003), and between GRS and head deviations in antero-posterior and 3D (p < 0.001). ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant results between vertebral level and accuracy (p < 0.001). Discussion and conclusion: The intraoperatively acquired image navigation system showed high accuracy. Screw deviation proved the guiding function of planning during screw insertion and demonstrated that for slight deviations no decrease in accuracy was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.