Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782999›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2026

Evaluation of pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from preoperative planning in intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Navigated lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective study.

Gianluca Vadalà, Giuseppe Francesco Papalia, Niccolò Nardi, Fabrizio Russo, Luca Ambrosio, Girolamo Maltese, Rocco Papalia, Vincenzo Denaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gianluca VadalàOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Giuseppe Francesco PapaliaOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Niccolò NardiOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Fabrizio RussoOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Luca AmbrosioOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Girolamo MalteseOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Rocco PapaliaOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.
Vincenzo DenaroOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative planning using navigation systems allows the surgeon to optimize pedicle screw placement, minimizing the risk of misplacement. Research question: This study aimed to assess the accuracy of pedicle screws placement, and the deviation of final position compared to preoperative planning using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) navigation system. Material and methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion with TLIF technique for degenerative spondylolisthesis using intraoperative imaging navigation system. Accuracy and superior facet joint violation (FJV) were assessed following Gertzbein and Robbins system (GRS) and Yson classification, respectively. Deviation from planning was calculated by linear, angular and 3D deviations between planned and implanted screws. The comparison of continuous variables by GRS was performed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test. The association between vertebral level and screw deviations was evaluated using ANOVA analysis. Results: The study included 40 patients with a mean age of 62.8 years. Of 180 pedicle screws implanted, 177 (98.30%) were clinically acceptable (GRS A + B) and 97.50% were classified as Yson grade 0. ANOVA reported statistically significant results between GRS and tip deviations in lateral-medial (p = 0.005), antero-posterior (p = 0.01) and 3D (p = 0.003), and between GRS and head deviations in antero-posterior and 3D (p < 0.001). ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant results between vertebral level and accuracy (p < 0.001). Discussion and conclusion: The intraoperatively acquired image navigation system showed high accuracy. Screw deviation proved the guiding function of planning during screw insertion and demonstrated that for slight deviations no decrease in accuracy was found.

Indexed as

DeviationNavigation systemsPedicle screw accuracyPreoperative planningSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID41782999
PMCPMC12955246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.