Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782937›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026

Inter-individual alignment of multimodal brain networks with anatomical constraints.

Yanis Aeschlimann, Anna Calissano, Theodore Papadopoulo, Samuel Deslauriers-Gauthier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanis AeschlimannUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, Sophia-Antipolis, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8427-1409
Anna CalissanoDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7403-0531
Theodore PapadopouloUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, Sophia-Antipolis, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1643-9988
Samuel Deslauriers-GauthierUniversité Côte d'Azur, Inria, Sophia-Antipolis, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-121X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When using a cortical parcellation, it is generally assumed that the regions correspond across subjects, meaning regions with the same label are expected to have the same structural or functional roles from one subject to any other. However, at a fine-grained scale, environmental and genetic factors shape both cortex and white matter differently, making it challenging to consistently label all parcels for every subject. Brain networks can be constructed with regions as nodes and their connectivity as edges. One critical step while constructing those networks is the definition of the nodes due to the spatial inter-individual variability, which can limit the reliability of group studies' results. In this work, we propose alignment criteria to register the brain nodes across subjects by allowing the permutation of tiny cortical regions. Those criteria account for multiple brain network perspectives built from different imaging modalities. Our across-subject multimodal alignment of brain networks includes constraints that restrict possible permutations to anatomically plausible ones. The identified permutations are finally applied to the brain networks not used for optimization, and also improve the alignment of these networks. This work has been validated on real magnetic resonance imaging data from the Human Connectome Project.

Indexed as

Brain networkCortical atlasFunctional connectivityGraph alignmentInter-subject variabilityStructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID41782937
PMCPMC12956296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.