Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782872›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026

Significant improvement with ivarmacitinib after suboptimal response to tofacitinib in severe alopecia areata: a case report and literature review.

Zulin Wan, Ying Wang, Dingquan Yang

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zulin WanGraduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dingquan YangDepartment of Dermatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated hair loss disorder, in which the JAK-STAT signaling pathway plays an important pathogenic role. Available agents for AA include minoxidil, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, among others. For adults with severe AA, JAK inhibitors have emerged as cornerstone systemic treatments, but the responses to them are variable. Ivarmacitinib is a novel and highly selective JAK1 inhibitor, which has been approved for AA in China recently with little real-world evidence. We present a case of a patient with severe AA who achieved significant improvement with ivarmacitinib after suboptimal response to tofacitinib, and review previous studies on switching therapy between different JAK inhibitors for AA. This case suggests that ivarmacitinib is a viable alternative for tofacitinib-refractory AA, possibly due to its higher JAK1 selectivity. Further studies are required to define ivarmacitinib's optimal position in AA treatment algorithm, and to elucidate underlying mechanisms behind JAK inhibitors, which is essential for more personalized and targeted therapy for severe AA.

Indexed as

Alopecia AreataPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolesAdultFemaleHumansJanus Kinase 1Treatment OutcomeJanus Kinase 1PiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinibalopecia areatacase reportivarmacitinibJAK1 selectivitytofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID41782872
PMCPMC12953536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.