Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41782845›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

"Do You Understand What I Am Saying?": Exploring Language Practices in Describing Life With Diabetes.

Jessica Gonzalez, Renee Crossman, Jude Spiers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica GonzalezUniversity of Alberta, Canada.
Renee CrossmanMemorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7226-638X
Jude SpiersUniversity of Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-2559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language is a vehicle to express and defend one's desired identity by employing socially normative strategies to promote and protect a preferred identity. In this qualitative secondary analysis, we explored the language practices in 30 interviews with 15 adults with diabetes who use insulin pumps. Inductive thematic analysis guided by Identity Process Theory illuminated how participants expressed and defended their preferred identities. Language strategies such as personification, humour, sarcasm, metaphors, similes, co-constructed stories, and joking, indicated trust with the listener and the speaker's association with diabetes. Metaphor and similes provided a comprehensible analogy to articulate experience. Distancing strategies, such as objectification and sarcasm, reflected a sense of ownership of diabetes. Protecting self-esteem and self-efficacy through whispering and justification was important when describing diabetes practices as deviant or individualized. Clinicians' attendance to language practices gives insight into identity and identity threats in a way direct questioning cannot.

Indexed as

Canadadiabetesdiabetes managementinsulin pumpslanguage analysislanguage practicesself-identity

Identifiers

PMID41782845
PMCPMC12954000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.